hI can you please tell me the difference between a rubi tx900 and a tx900n thanks

£11.25

one is rubbish and the other is hopeless

One has a longer measuring bar, thats it I think!

One is designed more on measuring and support for cutting on 45 dgs ( N series) and the other is basicly used for straight cutting but will do 45's as well..
They are an excellent cutter but are heavy..

Originally Posted by nybor62

one is rubbish and the other is hopeless

What cutter do you prefer? nybor62
rom Barry

I have TXN 900 and like it I think the N is more useful you can always ask Dave at Tradetiler

Originally Posted by Barry bp

What cutter do you prefer? nybor62
rom Barry

sigma barry ,there not really hopeless its a thing between sigma users and rubi, but imo sigma is the best

Can I be difficult and ask exactly why you prefer Sigma

i still have rubi cutters barry , but dont use them any more, the sigma cuts porcelain much easier than the rubi imo

i can cut thinner slithers with the sigma than i ever could with a rubi , its lighter than the rubi, the wheels last longer .

swivel arm for setting on 45, sprung beds , why get a jag when you van have a rolls

The OP was about the tx900n and the tx900, can members stick to that instead of thread hijacking.... this was after all the question and not a sigma question..

Originally Posted by Dave

One is designed more on measuring and support for cutting on 45 dgs ( N series) and the other is basicly used for straight cutting but will do 45's as well..
They are an excellent cutter but are heavy..

Hi Dave, Thanks for the information

the tx has a floating bed which is so much better for cutting porcline tiles, i think thats the only differance

Originally Posted by Dave

The OP was about the tx900n and the tx900, can members stick to that instead of thread hijacking.... this was after all the question and not a sigma question..

ok sorry point taken