Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Both interesting comments there, and both very right. Training centre's are fidning it hard to get the right accreditation. You'll find most of the good ones have some backing from a governing body.
So just make sure you're calling the right training centre's when looking.
I think in many cases there is funding available. |
You state in your post “You'll find most of the good ones have some backing from a governing body”. Inferring that the ones without accreditation are no good.
Although I think it is good for private centres to be accredited for
NVQ or the ICA/ACA, do not make the mistake of thinking that the training in a centre that dose not offer
NVQ or ICA/ACA is some how inferior. In fact it can sometimes mean the opposite. Where a non-accredited centre is free to cover the things they think a
tiler needs to no and are not swamped with a mountain of paper work. Meaning that the trainers have more time to spend on the students instead of cutting there way thorough all the red tape. This is not true however of an accredited centre though I am not in any way putting down the centres that are accredited. On the contrary they have worked very hard to gain accreditation and as I said they have had to jump through a lot of hoops but the fact is that they have to answer to the governing body and this can sometimes be a hindrance rather than a help.
Just in case there is any confusion as to where I stand. I am in favour of a competent and qualified work force but do still see a place for training centres that offer just the practical training.
By the way it is grate to have a place to debate these issue